Ransomware is when attackers lock your systems, and often copy your data, then demand money. If those systems hold customer or staff details, it is usually also a data leak or breach under India's new data protection law. You may have to tell several people quickly, while your team is also trying to get the business running again.
What it means for you
- Locked data counts, even if nothing was stolen. Losing access to customer records is a breach.
- CERT-In wants a report within 6 hours. That rule is already in force.
- From 13 May 2027, you also tell the Data Protection Board, the new regulator, and each affected customer.
- Attackers often go after your backups first. A backup they can delete will not save you.
- A backup you have never restored may not work on the day.
What to do
- Write one plan that covers recovery and every reporting deadline.
- Keep at least one backup copy that cannot be changed or deleted, and one offline.
- Practise a full restore and time it.
- Keep a list of who to call: your security team, your lawyer, CERT-In.
- After any incident, write down what went wrong and fix it.
The law: sections 2(u), 8(5) and 8(6) of the DPDP Act and Rules 6 and 7 of the DPDP Rules, 2025, from 13 May 2027; CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022 under section 70B(6) of the IT Act, already in force.
A ransomware attack is usually a personal data breach under section 2(u) of the DPDP Act, because it causes loss of access to personal data or its theft. From 13 May 2027, Rule 7 requires notice to the Board and each affected person without delay and a detailed report within 72 hours. CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022 separately require reporting within 6 hours of noticing it.
Key takeaways
- Ransomware that locks or steals personal data is a personal data breach under section 2(u): loss of availability counts, not only leaks.
- CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022 list ransomware among the incidents to report within 6 hours of noticing them.
- From 13 May 2027, Rule 7 adds notices to the Board and each affected person without delay, and a detailed Board report within 72 hours.
- Rule 6 expects continuity measures such as backups; keep at least one copy attackers cannot alter or delete, and prove restores work.
- Plan logs for both regimes: one year under Rules 6 and 8(3), and CERT-In's rolling 180 days kept within India.
A ransomware attack tests two things at once: whether you can bring the business back from a clean copy, and whether you can tell the right people the right facts on time. Most teams have thought about one of these. Very few have rehearsed both together, on the same clock, with the same incident record.
Our ransomware readiness work is engineering and security work, done with your IT, security and operations teams and alongside your legal counsel. We design backups that survive an attack, prove that restores work, and build the runbook that carries you from the first alert to the final report. This page explains the obligations, the five steps we follow, and what you get at the end.
Is a ransomware attack a personal data breach?
Usually, yes. Section 2(u) of the DPDP Act defines a personal data breach as any unauthorised processing, or accidental disclosure, acquisition, sharing, use, alteration, destruction or loss of access to personal data, that compromises its confidentiality, integrity or availability. Ransomware typically hits several of these at once:
- Availability: encrypted systems mean loss of access to customer, patient or employee records, even if nothing leaves your network.
- Confidentiality: many attacks copy data out before encrypting it, then threaten to publish it.
- Integrity: files and databases may be altered or corrupted, so restored data has to be checked, not assumed.
Section 8(6) requires you to intimate every personal data breach to the Data Protection Board and to each affected person, with no materiality threshold. Section 8(5) requires reasonable security safeguards to prevent breaches, and Rule 6(d) lists "measures for continued processing", such as backups, among them. Both apply from 13 May 2027. The security safeguards guide covers the rest of Rule 6.
Which reporting clocks start in a ransomware incident?
Two regimes run in parallel, and one does not replace the other.
CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022, issued under section 70B(6) of the IT Act, require service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporates and government organisations to report the cyber incidents listed in Annexure I within 6 hours of noticing them or being told about them. Annexure I includes malicious code attacks such as ransomware, as well as data breaches and data leaks. This is already in force.
The DPDP Rules then add the Board and the people affected. Rule 7 asks for a notice to each affected person and an initial intimation to the Board without delay, followed by a detailed report to the Board within 72 hours of becoming aware, or longer if the Board allows it on a written request.
- 0 hYou find out. Contain the breach and open the incident record.
- ASAPTell the Board without delay: what happened, how much, when, where and the likely impact.
- ASAPTell every affected person without delay, in plain language, with steps to stay safe and a contact.
- 72 hFile the detailed report: facts, cause, what you did to limit harm, who caused it, and the notices sent.
| Report | To | When | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber incident report | CERT-In | Within 6 hours of noticing the incident or being told about it | CERT-In directions, 28 April 2022, direction (ii) and Annexure I |
| Initial intimation: nature, extent, timing, location, likely impact | Data Protection Board | Without delay | Rule 7(2)(a), from 13 May 2027 |
| Notice in plain language: what happened, likely consequences, mitigation, steps the person can take, a contact | Each affected person | Without delay | Rule 7(1), from 13 May 2027 |
| Detailed report: facts and reasons, mitigation, findings on who caused it, remedial measures, report on notices sent | Data Protection Board | Within 72 hours of becoming aware, or longer if the Board allows | Rule 7(2)(b), from 13 May 2027 |
The same CERT-In directions require every covered entity to designate a point of contact for CERT-In, to synchronise system clocks with the NTP servers of the National Informatics Centre or National Physical Laboratory (or servers traceable to them), and to keep logs of all ICT systems securely for a rolling 180 days within Indian jurisdiction. From 13 May 2027, DPDP Rule 6(e) and Rule 8(3) add a one-year retention of logs and associated data. Accurate clocks and logs that survive the attack are what let you state a timeline with confidence in every one of these reports.
On the DPDP side, the Board is established but, as of early November 2026, its Chairperson and Members have not been appointed. Before 13 May 2027, confirm the Board's published channel for intimations and test that your team can reach it.
How do we get you ready? The five steps
Every engagement follows the same five steps. Each one produces something your team keeps and can run without us.
Runbooks, contacts and both clocks
Immutable and offline copies
Spot it early, shut the door
A restore you have already tested
Board, affected people, CERT-In; then review
1. Prepare: runbooks, contacts and the reporting clocks
We write a ransomware runbook with named owners and decision points: who declares an incident, who isolates systems, who speaks to CERT-In, counsel, customers and the press. Both clocks sit in it from the first page. The runbook records the time you noticed the incident (CERT-In) and the time you became aware of a personal data breach (DPDP), because they may differ and every deadline runs from them.
Alongside it sits a contact sheet that works when email and the directory are down: an out-of-band channel, phone numbers on paper, your CERT-In point of contact, counsel, key processors and any cyber insurer. Notice templates for the Board, affected people and CERT-In are drafted in advance for your counsel to approve, so that on the day you fill in facts rather than draft.
2. Protect backups: immutable and offline copies
Attackers commonly go after backups before they encrypt anything else. We review how your backups are taken, where they live and who can delete them. The design we typically recommend includes:
- At least one immutable copy that cannot be changed or deleted for a set retention period, even by an administrator.
- At least one offline or logically isolated copy, in a separate account with separate credentials and multi-factor authentication.
- Backups of what you need to rebuild, not only data: configurations, identity systems, secrets stores and infrastructure definitions.
- Encryption of backup copies (Rule 6(a) lists encryption among the safeguards), with keys stored away from the systems they protect.
- Logs shipped to a separate store that meets the CERT-In 180-day and DPDP one-year needs.
If a vendor hosts or runs your backups, it is a processor for DPDP purposes. Section 8(1) keeps you responsible for its processing, and Rule 6(f) expects safeguards to be written into the contract, including prompt notice to you of any incident.
3. Detect and contain
Rule 6(c) expects visibility of access through logs, monitoring and review, so that you can detect, investigate and remediate. We tune detection for the signs that usually come before encryption: new administrator accounts, attempts to delete backups or shadow copies, unusual mass file changes and large outbound transfers. The containment playbooks set out how to isolate hosts and network segments, revoke and reset credentials, and preserve evidence before anything is wiped, so that the facts needed for the 72-hour report survive.
4. Recover: a restore you have already tested
We agree recovery priorities with the business: which systems come back first, how much data loss is tolerable (recovery point objective) and how much downtime (recovery time objective). Then we test. A restore test rebuilds systems from the protected copies into a clean environment, checks the data for completeness and tampering, and records how long each step took against the target. Where the measured time misses the target, the gap becomes a ticket with an owner, not a footnote.
On the day, recovery means rebuilding from known-clean images and restoring from a point before the compromise, not decrypting in place and hoping. Restored personal data is checked for integrity, because alteration is itself part of a breach under section 2(u).
5. Report and learn: Board, affected people, CERT-In and the review
The runbook carries the reporting steps through to the end: the CERT-In report within 6 hours, the Board intimation and the notices to people without delay, and the 72-hour report to the Board. Log every notice to people as it goes out (channel, time, template version, delivery status), because the 72-hour report must include a report on those intimations. The breach notification guide sets out each notice's contents in full.
After recovery, a blameless post-incident review records the cause, what worked, what did not, and the remedial measures. Those measures feed the "remedial measures to prevent recurrence" that Rule 7(2)(b) asks for, and they update the runbook, backups and detection for next time.
What does an engagement look like, and what do you get?
A typical engagement starts with discovery: interviews with IT, security, operations and the people who own customer-facing systems, plus a review of your current backups, logging and incident documents. We then design and build with your team, run at least one restore test and one tabletop exercise, and hand over. Scope varies with the size of your estate and how much already exists, and we agree it with you at the start.
| Deliverable | What it is | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Ransomware runbook | Step-by-step response with owners, decision points and both reporting clocks | Turns CERT-In's directions and Rule 7 into tasks people can follow under pressure |
| Contact and decision sheet | Out-of-band contacts, CERT-In point of contact, counsel, processors, escalation rules | Works when email and the directory are down |
| Notice templates | Drafts for CERT-In, the Board (initial and 72-hour) and affected people, for counsel's approval | You fill in facts on the day instead of drafting |
| Backup architecture review and design | Current state, gaps, and the immutable and offline copy design | Evidence for the Rule 6(d) continuity measures |
| Restore test report | What was restored, how long it took, data checks, gaps against targets | Shows the backups work, with measured times |
| Containment playbooks | Isolation, credential reset and evidence preservation steps | Limits spread and keeps the facts you must report |
| Log and clock review | Log coverage, retention (180 days in India, one year under DPDP) and time synchronisation | Supports an accurate timeline in every report |
| Tabletop exercise and review template | A facilitated ransomware scenario and a post-incident review format | Finds gaps before an attacker does |
We aim to leave you with controls your own team runs and evidence that they work. We do not give legal opinions: decisions on notifications, regulators and, if it arises, any ransom demand sit with your business and its counsel (and, for a ransom, law enforcement). We do not promise that an attack will be prevented. What good preparation gives you is a faster, more orderly recovery and reports built on facts you can stand behind.
Why does this matter for DPDP penalties?
Under the Schedule to the Act, failing to take reasonable security safeguards to prevent a breach can attract a penalty of up to ₹250 crore, and failing to intimate a breach to the Board or affected people up to ₹200 crore. Section 33(2) lists the factors the Board weighs, including the gravity and duration of the breach and whether you took mitigation steps and how quickly. Tested backups, a working runbook and timely notices are the kind of evidence that speaks to those factors. The penalties guide has the full Schedule.
Ransomware readiness also sits naturally with our other work: privacy engineering for the wider DPDP programme, API security for the routes attackers often use to get in, and data localisation where logs and backups need to stay in India. The full list is on the services page.
How to start
- List the systems that hold personal data and the business processes that stop if they go down.
- Check who can delete your backups today, and whether any copy is immutable or offline.
- Confirm your CERT-In point of contact, your log retention and your clock synchronisation.
- Put the 6-hour CERT-In step and the Rule 7 steps into one incident runbook.
- Run a restore test and a ransomware tabletop exercise before 13 May 2027, then repeat them on a schedule.
These steps also appear in the DPDP compliance checklist and the implementation roadmap. If you would like us to review your backups, run the first restore test and write the runbook with your team, book a scoping call.
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to report a ransomware attack in India?
Usually yes, and often to more than one authority. CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022 list ransomware among the incidents that service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporates and government organisations must report within 6 hours of noticing them. If personal data is affected, from 13 May 2027 Rule 7 of the DPDP Rules also requires notice to the Data Protection Board and to each affected person without delay, and a detailed report to the Board within 72 hours.
Is ransomware a data breach under the DPDP Act?
In most cases, yes. Section 2(u) defines a personal data breach to include loss of access to personal data that compromises its availability, as well as unauthorised disclosure or acquisition. So an attack that only encrypts a customer database, with nothing copied out, can still be a breach, and section 8(6) requires every breach to be intimated.
What is the CERT-In 6 hour reporting rule?
It comes from CERT-In's directions of 28 April 2022 under section 70B(6) of the IT Act. Covered entities must report the cyber incidents listed in Annexure I, which include ransomware, data breaches and data leaks, within 6 hours of noticing them or being told about them. The same directions require logs of all ICT systems to be kept securely for a rolling 180 days within India, and a designated point of contact for CERT-In.
Do I need immutable backups for DPDP compliance?
Rule 6 lists continuity measures such as backups among the reasonable security safeguards, but it does not name immutable backups. In our view they are recommended practice, because ransomware operators commonly try to delete or encrypt backups first. A copy that cannot be changed or deleted for a set period, plus an offline copy, gives you something clean to restore.
How often should we test backup restores?
No DPDP Rule sets a frequency. As a working practice, we typically suggest restore tests of the most critical systems every quarter and a full recovery exercise at least once a year, with the measured times recorded. A backup that has never been restored is an assumption, not a control.
Should a company pay a ransom?
That is a decision for the business, taken with its legal counsel and law enforcement. We do not advise on it. Our work is to make sure you have tested backups, so that recovery does not depend on the attacker, and that the reporting steps in your runbook run whatever is decided.
How long must logs be kept in India?
CERT-In's April 2022 directions require logs of all ICT systems to be kept securely for a rolling 180 days within Indian jurisdiction. From 13 May 2027, DPDP Rule 6 and Rule 8(3) add a one-year retention of logs and associated data for detection, investigation and continuity. Design for the longer period and keep copies where attackers cannot reach them.
Turn this guide into a working programme
A 30-minute scoping call maps your gaps against the Rules and the order to close them. We aim to send a proposal, usually at a fixed fee, within three working days.
Related guides
This guide explains the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the DPDP Rules, 2025 as notified on 13 November 2025. It is general information, not legal advice. Check the official text, and your counsel, before relying on it.